“What do you do?”
It's a reasonable question, but for someone like me, it’s quietly reductive because it requests collapsing everything I am into a title that fits neatly on a name tag.
I've never had a clean answer, not because my work is unfocused, but because the question assumes that a person is best understood through a single function. I've spent enough time studying how people operate, in organizations, in their bodies, and in stories to know that the most interesting thing about anyone is rarely what they do. It's how they think, what they notice, what they keep returning to, across every context, regardless of the role they happen to be playing.
So here's a different question : What moves you? This gets closer to a person, and they get closer to me.
What moves me is the moment when something complex becomes clear, when the right framework meets the right problem, or when a piece of writing finally says the thing I was trying to say. When my team finds its rhythm on a project we thought was impossible, or a client who discovers that the body they've been fighting is actually on their side. I’m drawn to that moment across every domain I work in, and I've stopped believing it's a coincidence that the same satisfaction appears in a data governance and in a voiceover session. It’s one continuous thing with many expressions, but it is not many things.
I am one person and I contain all of this.
The question was never how to choose between them, but how to stop apologizing for the fact that I never did.
This isn't a portfolio of compartments. The same person who manages $6.6 million in data platform programs also narrates enterprise software with the instrument she trained for years. The same mind that designs behavior change frameworks for fitness clients also builds character from the inside out in a scene study class. The consultant who bridges technical and non-technical teams is also the filmmaker who writes, directs, and steps in front of the camera because she understands both sides of the process and what it takes to make a vision land.
The integration isn't something I manufacture for the purposes of a personal brand. It's just what it looks like when you stop treating different parts of yourself as separate.
Everything I do is informed by everything else I do. That's not a complication, that's the point.
I'm not looking for the next job. I'm looking for the right collaborations, projects, and partnerships that have room for the whole picture, not just the part that fits the brief.
Here's where I'm pointed right now:
SAG eligibility is an active goal, which means I'm specifically seeking projects, commercials, new media, and other SAG-signatory productions that move that needle. If you're casting or producing work that qualifies, I want to be in that conversation.
E-learning and corporate voiceover is a natural home for the combination of my skills. I have the ability to make complex material feel clear and human, to narrate with authority without losing warmth, to hold a listener's attention through content that could easily become abstract.
Wellness is where the corporate and the personal into the same conversation. I work with people who are intelligent about everything except how they've been treating their bodies to build sustainable practices. I'm interested in partnering with companies who understand the performance, focus, and resilience of their people don't stop at the office door. If you're building a corporate wellness initiative that goes beyond a gym stipend, or if you're an individual who wants a framework built for you rather than a generic program, that's the conversation I'm interested in. I'm also available for speaking engagements on the intersection of behavior change, fitness nutrition, and performance for audiences who are ready to talk about wellness as strategy, rather than afterthought.
Gallery and arts organization work is where my business skills meet my deepest creative commitments. The role I'm looking for doesn't have one title. It might be called Artist Liaison, Arts Program Manager, or something a given organization has named entirely differently. What it looks like, functionally, is bringing the operational rigor, stakeholder communication, and program management capacity I've built over a decade in enterprise environments to an institution that is oriented around artists and their work. Not as an administrator who happens to like art, but as someone who understands the creative process from the inside, and who is genuinely invested in the conditions that allow artists to do their best work. If you run a gallery, an arts nonprofit, or a creative agency, and you need someone who can build the infrastructure without flattening the culture, I'd like to talk.
And then there are the projects that don't fit a category. The ones where someone has a vision that needs a particular combination of skills to execute, and isn't sure where to find that combination in one person. Those are often the most interesting conversations.
If any of this resonates, the ask is simple: reach out. Not with a role description that may or may not fit, but with what you're trying to build, and let's figure out together whether there's something here.
That's the invitation.